Gypsy 83

topic posted Wed, November 1, 2006 - 11:35 PM by  Dani
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
This was in part inspired by the moderator's post in which a comment mentioned Gypsy 83.

Frankly, if you thought that movie was worth all the digital technology that went into it by creating copies of it, you couldn't be more of a tool. Anyone who knows a good movie when they see one could spot that movie a mile away as a bona fide piece of trash. I found it immensely interesting before I actually saw the movie (mostly because of the gay sex scene, I'll admit, and because whats-his-face-in-badly-done-makeup was really attractive, I grant you), and once I saw it, i really could not have regretted answering the trivia question that won me the stupid thing.
Firstly, It was about two goths' obsessions with Stevie Nicks. This strikes me as somewhat weird seeing as how I'm the only goth I ever met who was in love with Nicks before that movie became the new "thing" to love. That Sarah Rue chick looked, dressed, and sounded absolutely nothing like the woman (who is a goddess that that B-list actor could never aspire to be, let alone match), and it seemed like her entire character was revolved around the fact that she was fat.
They cried every 15 goddamn seconds and couldn't act to save their lives. Hey guys - Goths really aren't all that melancholy. Only when we're drunk, and even then, you'd be more likely to find us merrily dancing along to And One's "Wasted" than crying about whatever the fuck woes us this minute.

The subplots, if you could call them that, were weak and typical. Gay guy gets straight frat boy drunk (on Absinthe, no less!) and has his way with him (isn't that all of our fantasies, really?) just to be shit on. Big damn surprise. Fat chick (with tits bigger than me) falls in love with Amish married boy and gets dumped again... okay, not so typical, but still fucking weird.

But worst of all, it portrayed goths mostly as melancholy hopeless cases who cry too much. Not something I'd be proud of, you?

Oh, and they didn't even have the decency to include any actual goth music in the soundtrack.
No kids, The Cure isn't goth. They had one goth album. Lets let good pop be good pop, okay?

Anyone who likes that movie, I'd be very interested in selling you my copy for .000001 cent plus the cost of shipping. Thank you.

~Dax
posted by:
Dani
Providence
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Gypsy 83

    Thu, November 2, 2006 - 10:09 AM
    I just had a problem with how cliche the whole "go for your dreams" message was handled.... you didn't believe one second of it. The end at the club where she sings was laughable.

    I don't know any goths who love Stevie, although with all the leather, lace, boots and Nightbird schtick, you'd think there'd be more.

    The director just doesn't know anything about the scene in my opinion.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Gypsy 83

      Thu, November 2, 2006 - 1:38 PM
      While I wouldn't buy the DVD, I didn't think Gypsy 83 was THAT bad. Let me preface this post by saying that I'm not being aggro or criticizing you guys, I'm just explaining the movie and "the scene" from my viewpoint.

      First, as potentially the only one of us three (not sure how old Fennis is) who was actually born before 1983 and was old enough to be a part of the tail end of the "goth scene", I think it's cute that you kids today are experts on being goth and what it was all about. Again, this is not meant to be mean, you just have to look at it from us geezers' perspective. Nor am I claiming to be an expert on being goth.

      You probably don't know many goths who are into Stevie Nicks because you don't know any goths over the age of 35. While I was never a big fan and none of my alterna-goth-punk friends were either back when we were teenagers, and she's not considered true goth, there was some overlap. She was prototypical goth before goth became a scene. There's a correlation between true goths in the early '80s and Stevie Nicks who was into witchcraft, pale skin, and wearing black vampire-y clothes in the late '70s. A lot of people out of their teen years when goth happened transferred from being Fleetwood Mac fans as well as from the punk movement, although to a lesser degree. This movie didn't create a new obsession with Stevie Nicks, I don't know where that assertion came from. And if you paid attention to the movie, only Gypsy was into Stevie Nicks, Clive wasn't.

      I don't drink and didn't when I was a goth teenager. Not all goths drink absinthe (or alcohol in general) just like some goths like Stevie Nicks.

      I don't think the subplots were that typical or even weak, which Dani even admits after saying that the subplots are typical. Not only was Clive different because he was gay, he was also different because he was "goth." Having a first sexual encounter with a frat boy at a rest stop was more about his alienation than it was about him being goth and getting a frat boy drunk to have sex with him. And in regards to that, the frat boy was obviously a repressed homo, he didn't need to get drunk to get it on with Clive. Or maybe it wasn't that obvious if you didn't pick up on that. His rejection and taunting of Clive was supposed to show how gay people are pressured by "normal" society, and his icy glare at Clive as their bus drove away was on the surface hatred for Clive because Clive was different ("goth") but underneath it was his own self-loathing. Clive lived his life the way he felt comfortable and the frat boy could not, therefore the post-intimacy backlash. The screenplay writers are a little older than I am and you have to understand that back then the way you dressed and the music you listened to really did define who not only you were, but also who your friends were and who your friends were not. Goths or alternakids would NEVER date a jock or a frat boy. Never. Well, as a 99% general rule never. A lot of this scene was probably lost on you younger viewers because cliques and lines blurred in the '90s. Back then I never wanted to get it on with a jock, I do not fantasize about getting it on with a jock now, and I probably never will want to get it on with a jock. I think being attracted to frat boys is more un-goth than liking Stevie Nicks or being fat or crying every 15 seconds.

      The two main characters in Gypsy 83 were melancholy not because they were trying to be all goth, but because they were moving into adulthood and facing the harsh reality that life is combined with their added emotional baggage. Did you not listen to all their backstory? They had lives outside of listening to Cure records (er, sorry, CDs) or wanting to be Stevie Nicks. Besides, goths are usually melancholy. Next time you go to Batcave walk around with a big friendly Midwestern smile on your face. People in high school called us "mourners". I'm not saying you have to be depressed or sad to be goth, but back in highschool dressing the part was an outward expression of us being emotionally repressed. We wore black on the outside because black was how we felt on the inside. I'm not sure too many of the people in the "scene" back then had truly happy and fulfilling teenage years. Besides, it's not like saying goths are melancholy is a big surprise to anyone. This movie or even mainstream movies that use goths as props or the butts of jokes isn't going to influence anyone's opinion about goths or people in general who are different. I know you might be upset that it's not an accurate portrayal of what being goth is all about, but it's nowhere near as upsetting as say seeing Siouxsie on Club MTV.

      Try telling the Cure wasn't goth to people back in the '80s..... I listen(ed) to all the goth staples but I also love(d) Bananarama, did that make me less of a goth? The whole "I'm more goth than you are" argument is kind of lame. There was a guy at my high school who hated me because he was worried I was more "goth" than he was, so he would tell all our friends what a poser I was as if listening to Einsterzende Neubauten constantly and wearing a black trenchcoat and taking art classes made him some sort of expert on being goth. The only people I would call "posers" back then were the girls who would go to the underage alternative night at the big club when the next day was a school holiday and think that wearing black would make them fit in so they would show up wearing a black turtleneck and Guess acid washed jeans. A lot of bands that get played in goth clubs aren't technically goth, but that doesn't mean listening to them isn't "goth". Joy Division. Chameleons. Depeche Mode. Fad Gadget. Visage. New Order (who have some really angsty lyrics and songs). Just because they're not Sisters of Mercy or didn't appear in Propaganda doesn't mean they can't be considered goth. Yeah the soundtrack was paltry, but I assume it was due to budgetary reasons and obtaining licenses and not because the director is ignorant about real goth music.

      To me the message of Gypsy 83 wasn't "go for your dreams" it was "live your life." For Gypsy that meant leaving home and moving to NYC where she felt like she belonged (and which is why the crowd at Night of 1,000 Stevies was shown as accepting her, even though I agree she totally sucked) and for Clive that meant discovering that he was going to be Clive no matter where he lived and he was comfortable with that. I think the writer/director knows about the "scene", I just think his is a totally different take on it than someone who is 19 or in their early 20's.

      Again, I'm just trying to contribute to the dialogue, I'm not ragging on anyone at all.
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Gypsy 83

        Thu, November 2, 2006 - 2:11 PM
        I don't think either one of used the word "poser", or was trying the "I'm more goth than you are" argument.... I simply think it's bad filmmaking.... definitely not worth arguing about.

        I'm not goth, anyway, and although I love early post-punk, 80s gothic rock and 4AD style ethereal stuff, I would never promote myself as such.... I just love good music.

        I think Stevie was cool as shit in her early days, especially first two solo albums, I daresay she'll never end up on a goth comp for purely musical reasons.....
        • Re: Gypsy 83

          Thu, November 2, 2006 - 9:15 PM
          That's an excellent way to put it. Loving "GOOD" music is far preferable to loving simply "goth" music.
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: Gypsy 83

            Fri, November 3, 2006 - 3:38 PM
            I agree with you on most of what you just wrote, I think we're both reading way too much into each other's comments.

            I meant Clive was "different" not only because he was gay, but he was also different because he was "goth", as in he was even more abnormal within a group of abnormality (gays). Besides the fauxhawk trend of a few years ago, "alternative" gay people are a very small minority within the gay community.

            I totally agree that hanging around people just like you is boring, but back in the '80s that's really the way it was. The Breakfast Club is actually a pretty accurate slice-of-life of high school back then, and the writers of Gypsy 83 grew up in that era, so that's their point-of-view on the goth scene and also teenage coming-of-age. The "freaks" in middle and high school had to band together for protection. Before Nirvana came along and if you lived outside a big city you were a target because you were a "weirdo."

            I'm more goth than you are.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Gypsy 83

              Sat, November 4, 2006 - 4:11 PM
              PS - Either you're not familiar with the Smiths' repertoire, or you're too melancholy to know attempts at humor.

              So you don't consider the Cure a goth band, but you apparently consider Dead Can Dance one? Interesting....

              When you use terms like "subplot" it means you are also looking way too much at a film.

              I'm going to go light some candles and paint my fingernails black.
              • Re: Gypsy 83

                Sat, November 4, 2006 - 7:26 PM
                PS - Either you're not familiar with the Smiths' repertoire, or you're too melancholy to know attempts at humor.
                --- This comment makes absolutely no sense to me.

                So you don't consider the Cure a goth band, but you apparently consider Dead Can Dance one? Interesting....
                ---- When did I ever say that I considered Dead Can Dance one? Are you assuming things again? While Dead Can Dance was pretty goddamn dark for what they were, I would have a bone to pick with anyone who considered them goth. Firstly, they're entirely too brilliant to be a goth band, and two, I think we can safely say that DCD are clearly a "World" music band. If you don't know what that means, Wikipedia it.
                I don't think I can say this any more - JUST BECAUSE GOTHS LIKE IT DOESN'T MAKE IT GOTH.

                The closest DCD ever got to being Goth was during Brenden Perry's solo stuff, which could be classified as Neo-Folk, but then even Neo Folk isn't goth, per se`.

                A "Subplot" is a very legitimate part of a story. How taking those into account is looking too much at it is beyond my scope of understanding.

                But since you're "so old", you would be a million times my intellectual superior, now wouldn't you? So you should know that ;-)
                • Unsu...
                   

                  Re: Gypsy 83

                  Mon, November 6, 2006 - 10:27 AM
                  Sorry, it was some other kid who mentioned DCD in the other thread not you. Sorry for my confusion. Alzheimer's you know....

                  > > > I cannot help but think that you're taking an approach that is entirely too psychological to the whole thing.

                  That was your comment to me on my analyses of the movie and you also said how this movie was a throwaway and a waste of time, but my point was that if you even bring up the word "subplot" you're admitting that you're analyzing and deconstructing the movie. It's like saying "Bring It On 2" was a total waste of a movie and doesn't deserve any reflection and then bring up how unsatisfying or weak the character subplots are. I think you care more about Gypsy 83 than you're letting on. That's all. Carry on.

                  > > > Either you're not familiar with the Smiths' repertoire, or you're too melancholy to know attempts at humor.
                  --- This comment makes absolutely no sense to me.

                  Then I "assume" that means you don't know much about the Smiths. Who were not a goth band but that goths sometimes like and who I quoted in one of my posts which apparently went past you.

                  I need to go take my Metamucil now.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Gypsy 83

                    Mon, November 6, 2006 - 5:51 PM
                    No, Morrissey's voice is annoying. I don't care if he's gayer than Wayne Hussey.

                    Im still more goth than you.
      • Re: Gypsy 83

        Thu, November 2, 2006 - 9:11 PM
        Firstly, before you read this post that I'm about to write, I am not trying to incite a flamewar here. Nor am I trying to act "gother than thou". It's clear that you have at least a general idea of what you're talking about, but let's take it back a few steps, shall we.

        <i>You probably don't know many goths who are into Stevie Nicks because you don't know any goths over the age of 35. </i>
        Firstly, it's a really horrible idea to assume anything about me, young as I may be, I can accurately state that at the very least, 50% of the people I associate with on a day to day basis are over 35, "goth status" not withstanding. I still get laughed at for loving Stevie Nicks by my "over 35 goth friends", which mostly stems from my mother's music taste that I grew up on. While she didn't particularly like Nick's solo stuff, she was a heavy Fleetwood Mac fan, along with Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, and The Doors also topping that list. Growing up with Fleetwood Mac eventually was the seed that grew to me to search out Nicks' solo stuff when i was getting heavily into music. I reiterate, I have met exactly one person who is into the whole goth thing that loves Stevie, and she wasn't goth when I met her initially.

        <i>This movie didn't create a new obsession with Stevie Nicks, I don't know where that assertion came from. And if you paid attention to the movie, only Gypsy was into Stevie Nicks, Clive wasn't.</i>
        In my area, believe it or not, it did. i cannot tell you how many people have come up to me since they've seen the movie and asked me to burn Nicks CDs for them. Now, suddenly, the idea for my band to cover "Rooms on Fire" is cool, whereas beforehand, people either looked confused or, as I said, laughed (they also laugh at my assertion that Bonnie Tyler's "Total Eclipse of the Heart" is just BEGGING to be done as a Nick Cave-style goth epic, but that's another rant.). And the movie did portray the goth scene to love Nicks - hence the idea of a "Night of a Thousand Stevies". While I hear that the night is an actual event, I can probably guarantee that there aren't droves of goths lining up at the door, either.

        <i>I don't drink and didn't when I was a goth teenager. Not all goths drink absinthe (or alcohol in general) just like some goths like Stevie Nicks.</i>
        I'm not sure where this comment really came from, but I think that you're under the impression that I'm generalizing Goths as drunks. While some don't drink, I grant you, goth <i>did</i> stem from the punk scene after all ;-)

        <i>I don't think the subplots were that typical or even weak, which Dani even admits after saying that the subplots are typical.</i>
        Well, falling in love with a married Amish man isn't typical, no, but it's still strange. And I never said they weren't weak. They were horribly weak. Making an entire movie about teen angst is pretty weak, never mind unnecessary.

        <i>Not only was Clive different because he was gay</i>
        Different from whom, exactly? Didn't you say you were part of the original goth scene? Suffice to say, a scene that not only accept but also, to a certain degree, encourages men in makeup, skirts, and other forms of androgyny is also pretty accepting of homosexuals. Not only that, but any man who participates in the act of makeup, skirts, and other forms of androgyny is at least comfortable with elements of drag (let's call a horse a horse here) - if not bisexual.

        <i>Having a first sexual encounter with a frat boy at a rest stop was more about his alienation than it was about him being goth and getting a frat boy drunk to have sex with him. And in regards to that, the frat boy was obviously a repressed homo, he didn't need to get drunk to get it on with Clive. Or maybe it wasn't that obvious if you didn't pick up on that. His rejection and taunting of Clive was supposed to show how gay people are pressured by "normal" society, and his icy glare at Clive as their bus drove away was on the surface hatred for Clive because Clive was different ("goth") but underneath it was his own self-loathing. </i>
        I cannot help but think that you're taking an approach that is entirely too psychological to the whole thing.

        <i>Back then I never wanted to get it on with a jock, I do not fantasize about getting it on with a jock now, and I probably never will want to get it on with a jock. I think being attracted to frat boys is more un-goth than liking Stevie Nicks or being fat or crying every 15 seconds.</i>
        I have to say that the entire idea of being friends with and associating only with people that are just like you is completely lost on me. believe me, if all of the people I knew were goth, I'd be quite a bored person. The feeling that everyone and everything you surround yourself with must be "goth" is simply ludicrous to me, call me naive.

        <i>Besides, goths are usually melancholy.</i>
        I'm sorry, but we'll have to agree to disagree there.

        <i>back in highschool dressing the part was an outward expression of us being emotionally repressed. We wore black on the outside because black was how we felt on the inside. I'm not sure too many of the people in the "scene" back then had truly happy and fulfilling teenage years.</i>
        Personally, I think that using "depression" as an excuse to be a goth is a pretty piss-poor reason to be a goth. And wearing black because "that's how you feel inside" reminds me a little too much to be comfortable with of teenagers who cut themselves all over their Korn records. I mean, let's be serious. Or perhaps people took themselves too seriously. You got one point correct, I wasn't there, but I'm pretty sure that's not how it went.
        And let's be realistic here, <i>no one</i> had good teen aged years. If you did, there's something wrong with you.

        <i>Besides, it's not like saying goths are melancholy is a big surprise to anyone.</i>
        No, you're right, but that doesn't mean that a movie that's supposedly made by people who are oh-so-versed in the goth scene should perpetuate such stereotypes, and it doesn't mean I should like it.

        <i>I know you might be upset that it's not an accurate portrayal of what being goth is all about, but it's nowhere near as upsetting as say seeing Siouxsie on Club MTV.</i>
        Been there. Not only was "Peek-a-Boo" on MTV, but "Face to Face" was in the Batman soundtrack and Bauhaus has now opened for NIN. The mainstream access of goth isn't what's upsetting, it's the fact that so much of it <i>is</i> so accessable and people still have no idea what it is, or have horribly warped versions of it. That's the upsetting part.

        <i>Try telling the Cure wasn't goth to people back in the '80s..... I listen(ed) to all the goth staples but I also love(d) Bananarama, did that make me less of a goth?</i>
        Hey, as I've gone on and on about, I love Stevie Nicks - I also love Black Sabbath, most 70s rock, psychadelia, most 80s pop, Madonna, AFI, Concrete Blonde, and a slew of other non-goth music. It doesn't make anyone less of a "goth". And it doesn't necessarily mean anything. All it means to me is that I like, and regularly listen to music that I happen to enjoy and appreciate countless other artists for varied reasons, even if their music isn't something I personally have a taste for. The Cure had moments of severe melancholy, and I'll be the first to admit that "Pornography" was an almost comically goth album, but I cannot accept that The Cure were, from a musical standpoint, a goth band at most points of their career. Sure Goths love them, but this brings me back to the point that needing everything that you like or associate yourself with to be goth is really stupid and limiting, any way you look at it. Personally, i think that people needing everything they enjoy to be "goth" is what ruined the goth scene over the past ten years. Just because some Goths have a taste for EBM (or anything else, for that matter) doesn't make it goth. Point blank.
        • Re: Gypsy 83

          Thu, November 2, 2006 - 9:12 PM
          Hmm... this is a good way to find out that HTML doesn't work on tribe.net. Noted for future reference.

Recent topics in "GAY GOTH BOYS"